Brief Overview
- On Divine Mercy Sunday in 2020, Father José Guadalupe Aguilera Murillo livestreamed Mass from San Isidro Labrador Catholic Church in Querétaro, Mexico, during the coronavirus pandemic.
- A striking phenomenon occurred when white light beams appeared to emanate from the Divine Mercy image placed in the background of the broadcast.
- The Divine Mercy devotion, rooted in the revelations of St. Faustina Kowalska, emphasizes Christ’s mercy through an image featuring red and white rays symbolizing blood and water.
- Many viewers interpreted the light beams as a possible miraculous sign tied to the feast day and the image’s spiritual significance.
- Catholic teaching encourages discernment regarding such events, balancing openness to the supernatural with careful evaluation.
- This article examines the event, its context within Catholic theology, and the Church’s approach to alleged miracles.
Detailed Response
The Event at San Isidro Labrador Church
On April 19, 2020, Father José Guadalupe Aguilera Murillo celebrated Mass at San Isidro Labrador Catholic Church in Querétaro, Mexico, amid strict lockdown measures due to the coronavirus pandemic. With churches closed to the public, he livestreamed the liturgy to reach his parishioners. That Sunday marked the feast of Divine Mercy, a significant day in the Catholic liturgical calendar established by Pope John Paul II in 2000. To honor the occasion, Father Murillo placed an image of the Divine Mercy—depicting Jesus with red and white rays streaming from His heart—in the background of the broadcast. During the stream, viewers noticed something unusual: beams of white light seemed to extend from the image across the altar. The phenomenon was captured on video and quickly spread online, prompting discussion among the faithful. Some saw it as a divine sign, while others questioned whether it could be explained naturally, such as by lighting or camera effects. The timing, coinciding with Divine Mercy Sunday, fueled speculation about its significance. No official statement from the local diocese or the Vatican has confirmed or denied the event as miraculous. This lack of formal judgment leaves room for personal reflection within the bounds of Catholic teaching.
The Divine Mercy Devotion and Its Origins
The Divine Mercy devotion traces its roots to St. Faustina Kowalska, a Polish nun who received visions of Jesus in the 1930s. In her diary, she recorded Christ’s instructions to spread a message of mercy, particularly through an image He described to her. The image shows Jesus with one hand raised in blessing and the other touching His heart, from which red and white rays emerge. These rays, as Jesus explained to Faustina, represent the blood and water that flowed from His side on the cross (John 19:34). The devotion gained prominence when Pope John Paul II canonized Faustina in 2000 and designated the second Sunday of Easter as Divine Mercy Sunday. The Church promotes this devotion as a way to reflect on God’s mercy and seek forgiveness (CCC 1422-1498). The image itself is not considered magical but serves as a sacramental, a visible sign meant to inspire faith and prayer. Jesus reportedly told Faustina that the image would be a source of grace for souls who venerate it with trust. The event in Querétaro aligns with this promise, at least in the perception of some believers. However, the Church does not require acceptance of private revelations like Faustina’s for salvation (CCC 67).
The Symbolism of the Rays
In St. Faustina’s diary, Jesus explicitly defined the meaning of the rays in the Divine Mercy image. The pale ray, He said, stands for the water that cleanses souls, likely alluding to baptism and reconciliation (CCC 1213, 1425-1426). The red ray signifies the blood of Christ, shed for the life of the world, a clear reference to the Eucharist (CCC 1322-1419). Together, these elements point to the sacraments as channels of God’s mercy. Faustina wrote that Jesus promised protection to those who trust in this mercy, shielding them from divine judgment. This message resonates with the Gospel call to repentance and faith (Mark 1:15). The white beams seen in Querétaro were interpreted by some as a visual echo of the pale ray, reinforcing the image’s theological meaning. Whether the light was supernatural or a natural effect, its alignment with the feast day struck many as significant. Catholic theology holds that God can use visible signs to communicate spiritual truths (CCC 1145-1152). Still, the Church cautions against overemphasizing such phenomena without proper investigation.
Catholic Teaching on Miracles
The Catholic Church defines a miracle as an extraordinary event that surpasses natural laws and points to God’s action (CCC 548). Miracles are not ends in themselves but signs meant to strengthen faith or confirm a divine message. The Church has a long history of evaluating alleged miracles, from the healing at Lourdes to Eucharistic prodigies. Such events undergo rigorous scrutiny by ecclesiastical authorities, often involving scientific analysis and theological reflection. In the case of Querétaro, no formal investigation has been reported as of March 31, 2025. Without official review, Catholics are free to regard the light beams as a personal inspiration rather than a confirmed miracle. The Catechism emphasizes that private revelations, even approved ones, do not add to the deposit of faith (CCC 67). Thus, the event’s authenticity is secondary to its potential to draw people toward Christ’s mercy. Historical examples, like the apparitions at Fatima, show that the Church prioritizes spiritual fruit over sensationalism. Believers are encouraged to approach such occurrences with both openness and prudence.
The Context of Divine Mercy Sunday
Divine Mercy Sunday, celebrated the week after Easter, focuses on Christ’s redemptive love revealed in His resurrection. Pope John Paul II instituted the feast in response to St. Faustina’s revelations, where Jesus requested its establishment. The liturgy that day includes readings about mercy, such as John 20:19-31, where the risen Christ offers peace and forgiveness. The feast also ties to the sacrament of confession, which Faustina’s writings heavily emphasize (CCC 1422-1498). In 2020, the global pandemic heightened the day’s relevance, as people sought hope amid suffering. Father Murillo’s decision to feature the Divine Mercy image during the livestream reflected this context. The appearance of light beams, whether miraculous or not, amplified the feast’s message for viewers. The Church teaches that God’s mercy is always available, especially in times of trial (CCC 605). The event in Querétaro, intentional or coincidental, served as a reminder of that promise. It invited the faithful to trust in Christ’s compassion, a core theme of the celebration.
Natural Explanations vs. Supernatural Claims
Skeptics of the Querétaro event suggest that the light beams could have a natural cause, such as sunlight reflecting off a surface or a camera lens flare. Churches often use lighting to enhance worship, and the placement of the Divine Mercy image near the altar might have caught an incidental beam. Video technology can also produce visual artifacts, especially in low-budget livestreams common during the pandemic. These possibilities do not disprove a miracle but highlight the need for careful analysis. The Church has historically considered such factors when evaluating phenomena, as seen in its rejection of some alleged apparitions. For instance, the 1531 image of Our Lady of Guadalupe was studied for natural explanations before being deemed extraordinary. In Querétaro, no scientific study has been documented, leaving the cause unresolved. Catholic teaching neither dismisses natural explanations nor demands belief in the supernatural here (CCC 90). The faithful are free to interpret the event as a meaningful coincidence or a divine act. Regardless, the focus remains on the mercy the image represents.
The Role of Sacramentals in Catholic Life
The Divine Mercy image is a sacramental, a sacred sign instituted by the Church to prepare people for grace (CCC 1667-1679). Unlike sacraments, which confer grace directly, sacramentals dispose believers to receive it through prayer and devotion. Jesus told St. Faustina that venerating the image with faith would bring spiritual benefits. This aligns with the Church’s use of holy water, rosaries, and icons to foster holiness. The Querétaro event, if natural, still fits this purpose by drawing attention to Christ’s mercy. If supernatural, it would reinforce the image’s role as a conduit of grace. Either way, the Church teaches that sacramentals are effective only when paired with genuine faith (CCC 1670). The light beams, real or perceived, prompted many to reflect on their relationship with God. Historical sacramentals, like the scapular of Mount Carmel, have similarly inspired devotion without requiring miracles. The event underscores how physical signs can deepen spiritual awareness.
St. Faustina’s Diary and Promises
St. Faustina’s diary, titled Divine Mercy in My Soul, records Christ’s words about the image and its purpose. He promised that it would remind people of His mercy and encourage acts of charity. The diary specifies that souls who honor the image with trust will receive protection and grace. This promise does not guarantee visible signs like light beams but points to interior blessings. The Querétaro phenomenon, if authentic, could be seen as an external affirmation of these words. Faustina’s writings stress that faith and works together activate God’s mercy, a teaching rooted in James 2:17. The Church approved her diary for private devotion, though it remains optional for Catholics (CCC 67). The 2020 event aligns with her emphasis on mercy during hardship, as the pandemic tested global faith. Whether miraculous or not, it echoed her call to trust in Christ. The diary’s focus on spiritual renewal offers a lens to interpret such occurrences.
The Church’s Process for Investigating Miracles
When an unusual event like the Querétaro light beams gains attention, the Church may initiate an investigation. This process begins at the diocesan level, where the local bishop assesses the phenomenon’s authenticity and impact (CCC 828). Experts in science, theology, and medicine might be consulted to rule out natural causes. The inquiry examines whether the event promotes genuine faith or risks superstition. If deemed credible, it may be forwarded to the Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith. Historically, this rigor has confirmed miracles like those at Fatima while dismissing others. No public record indicates that Querétaro’s bishop launched such a probe by March 31, 2025. Without official scrutiny, the event remains a matter of personal belief. The Church prioritizes pastoral care over hasty judgments in these cases. Catholics are thus free to find inspiration in it without obligation.
Public Reaction and Spiritual Impact
The livestreamed Mass from San Isidro Labrador Church reached a wide audience, and the light beams sparked varied responses. Some viewers hailed it as a miracle, sharing the video across social media with praise and awe. Others expressed skepticism, urging caution until more evidence emerged. The event’s timing—during a global crisis and on Divine Mercy Sunday—amplified its emotional resonance. For many, it offered comfort and a sense of God’s presence amid uncertainty. Catholic teaching values such reactions when they lead to prayer and repentance (CCC 1430-1433). Even if unexplained, the phenomenon stirred devotion, aligning with the feast’s purpose. Critics, however, warned against credulity, reflecting the Church’s balanced stance. The split in opinion mirrors past reactions to alleged miracles, like the 1917 Fatima sun dance. Ultimately, its spiritual fruit matters more than its classification.
Historical Parallels in Catholic Tradition
The Querétaro event recalls other instances where light or visual signs accompanied religious moments. At Fatima in 1917, thousands reported the sun moving unnaturally, a phenomenon later approved by the Church. Similarly, the 13th-century Eucharistic miracle of Bolsena involved blood visibly staining a host. These events, unlike Querétaro’s, underwent formal investigation and gained official recognition. Light as a symbol of divine presence recurs in scripture, such as the Transfiguration (Matthew 17:2). While the Divine Mercy image lacks a comparable historical miracle, its rays evoke this tradition. The 2020 occurrence fits a pattern of God using visible signs to communicate, though on a smaller scale. Catholic history shows that such events often inspire faith without requiring universal acceptance. Querétaro’s beams, whether natural or not, follow this lineage of symbolic acts. They invite reflection rather than demand belief.
The Pandemic’s Influence on Perception
The coronavirus pandemic shaped the context of the Querétaro event in profound ways. With churches shuttered and millions isolated, livestreamed Masses became a lifeline for Catholics worldwide. Divine Mercy Sunday 2020 carried extra weight as people grappled with fear and loss. The light beams, appearing in this setting, struck viewers as a timely sign of hope. The Church teaches that God’s mercy shines brightest in suffering (CCC 1508). Father Murillo’s broadcast, intended to sustain his flock, gained unexpected prominence through the phenomenon. This backdrop likely heightened its perceived significance, as faith often seeks meaning in crisis. Past pandemics, like the Black Death, also saw rises in reported miracles, reflecting human longing for divine aid. The event’s viral spread online further tied it to the era’s digital worship shift. It became a shared moment of grace for a scattered Church.
Balancing Faith and Reason
Catholic theology calls for a harmony between faith and reason when approaching events like Querétaro’s (CCC 159). Faith welcomes the possibility of miracles, while reason evaluates their plausibility. The light beams could be a divine act, a natural effect, or a blend of both—God often works through ordinary means. The Church avoids blind credulity, urging discernment to avoid deception or superstition (CCC 2116). At the same time, it rejects outright dismissal of the supernatural, honoring God’s freedom to act. The Querétaro case exemplifies this tension, lacking evidence to settle the question definitively. Believers can thus hold either view without contradicting doctrine. St. Thomas Aquinas argued that miracles confirm faith, not replace it. Here, the event’s value lies in its call to trust Christ’s mercy, not in proving a point. This balance keeps the focus on spiritual growth over speculation.
The Broader Message of Mercy
Beyond the light beams, the Querétaro event underscores the Divine Mercy devotion’s core message: God’s love redeems humanity. St. Faustina’s revelations emphasize forgiveness and trust, echoing Luke 6:36’s call to mercy. The image, with or without miracles, points to Christ’s sacrifice and the sacraments (CCC 1322-1498). The 2020 phenomenon, whatever its cause, reinforced this during a global trial. It invited viewers to seek reconciliation and hope, fulfilling the devotion’s purpose. The Church teaches that mercy is God’s greatest attribute, freely offered to all (CCC 199-231). Whether the beams were a sign or a coincidence, they highlighted this truth. The event’s legacy lies in its ability to stir faith, not in its classification. Catholics are called to live this mercy through prayer and charity, as Faustina urged. That, more than lights, is the devotion’s lasting gift.
Personal Freedom in Private Revelations
The Church grants Catholics freedom to accept or set aside private revelations like the Divine Mercy (CCC 67). St. Faustina’s visions, though approved, are not binding on the faithful. The Querétaro event, tied to this devotion, falls under the same principle. Believers may see it as a miracle without requiring others to agree. This flexibility reflects the Church’s respect for individual conscience guided by reason and faith (CCC 1776-1802). The light beams, lacking official status, remain a personal matter rather than a universal claim. Historical precedents, like the optional devotion to the Sacred Heart, show this approach in action. The event’s meaning thus varies by person, from a profound sign to a curious footnote. The Church prioritizes unity in essentials over uniformity in such cases. This freedom keeps the focus on Christ, not contested phenomena.
The Role of the Priest in the Event
Father José Guadalupe Aguilera Murillo played a key role in the Querétaro event, albeit unintentionally. By livestreaming Mass and placing the Divine Mercy image prominently, he created the conditions for the phenomenon. His intent was pastoral—to bring the liturgy to his isolated parishioners—not to stage a spectacle. Priests often use visual aids to enhance worship, a practice rooted in Church tradition (CCC 1159-1162). The light beams, whether planned or spontaneous, emerged from this effort. Father Murillo has not publicly claimed a miracle, leaving interpretation to others. His role mirrors that of countless priests who facilitate faith without controlling outcomes. The event’s spread online extended his ministry beyond Querétaro, touching a global audience. Catholic teaching honors such service as a channel of grace (CCC 1546-1553). His actions frame the incident as a moment of shared prayer, not a personal feat.
Lessons for Contemporary Catholics
The Querétaro event offers practical lessons for Catholics today. It highlights the power of sacramentals to inspire faith, especially in digital formats. It also shows how God’s mercy remains relevant, even in modern crises like pandemics. The light beams, miraculous or not, call believers to trust in Christ’s promises, as St. Faustina taught. The Church encourages using such moments to deepen prayer and charity (CCC 2447). The event’s ambiguity teaches discernment, a skill vital in an age of information overload. Catholics can draw hope from it without fixating on its cause. It also underscores the value of community, as viewers united in reflection online. The devotion’s emphasis on forgiveness offers a counterpoint to today’s divisions (CCC 2840-2845). Above all, it invites a return to the sacraments, where mercy is assured.
Theological Implications of the Event
Theologically, the Querétaro light beams raise questions about God’s interaction with the world. If miraculous, they affirm His ability to intervene visibly, as in Exodus 13:21’s pillar of fire. If natural, they show His providence through creation, aligning with CCC 301. Either way, they point to the Incarnation, where the divine enters the material (CCC 461-463). The event ties to the Divine Mercy’s focus on redemption, a cornerstone of Christian belief (CCC 599-623). It also echoes the Church’s eschatological hope—mercy triumphing over judgment (James 2:13). The lack of official ruling keeps it a mystery, reflecting God’s transcendence. For theologians, it invites study of how signs shape faith without defining it. The beams, real or symbolic, reinforce the devotion’s call to holiness. They suggest that mercy, not miracles, is the ultimate revelation.
Conclusion: A Call to Faith and Discernment
The light beams from the Divine Mercy image in Querétaro remain an open question as of March 31, 2025. Whether a miracle or a natural effect, they stirred hearts toward Christ’s mercy on a significant feast day. Catholic teaching neither confirms nor denies the event, leaving room for personal reflection. The phenomenon’s value lies in its alignment with St. Faustina’s message of trust and forgiveness. It reminds believers that God speaks through both the ordinary and the extraordinary (CCC 1145-1152). The Church calls for discernment, ensuring faith rests on Christ, not fleeting signs (CCC 156-159). For those moved by it, the event is a prompt to live mercy actively. For others, it’s a neutral occurrence, dwarfed by the Gospel itself. Ultimately, it points beyond itself to the eternal truth of God’s love. Catholics are left to ponder it with humility and hope.
Here’s the video below:
Here’s the photo below:
